Tax Practice Strategy: Building a Profitable CPA Firm in 2025

The traditional tax practice model is breaking down. Seasonal compliance, April crunch, quiet summers: that model doesn’t work anymore. Clients want year-round advice. AI handles routine returns. And the talent pipeline has collapsed: 37% fewer CPA exam candidates since 2016, with 75% of current CPAs nearing retirement.¹

Most firms feel this pressure but keep operating the same way. They know clients want advisory services (95% of tax professionals say so²) but they’re stuck in compliance mode, billing by the hour, and watching margins shrink.

This guide covers how to fix that: business models that actually work, pricing that captures value, which clients to keep and which to fire, and how technology changes the math on everything.

Table of Contents

• The Changing Tax Practice Landscape
• Tax Practice Business Models
  • Compliance-Only Model
  • Advisory-First Model
  • Hybrid CAS Model
  • Niche Specialization Model
• From Compliance to Advisory: The Strategic Shift
• Pricing Strategies for Tax Practices
• Client Selection and Portfolio Management
• Specialization vs. Generalist Approach
• Technology as Competitive Advantage
• Staffing Models for Modern Practices
• Practice Profitability Metrics
• Common Strategic Mistakes
• FAQs: Tax Practice Strategy

The Changing Tax Practice Landscape

Three forces are hitting tax practices at once: technology that automates routine work, clients who expect more, and a workforce that’s shrinking.

Technology Disruption

AI now extracts data from tax forms, prepares basic returns, identifies deductions, and flags errors. Ten years ago, that work consumed 60% of practitioner time. The IRS Direct File program, while temporarily suspended, signals where things are heading: free basic tax prep, simple returns as commodity.³

Technology will replace certain tax work. The open question is how fast. Firms using automation to kill low-value work and shift capacity to advisory will grow. Firms that see automation as a threat will struggle.

Client Expectations

Clients don’t accept the seasonal model anymore. CPA disappears April 16, reappears in January. 68% of business owners wish their CPA offered strategic consulting.² They want tax planning, not just tax filing. Financial forecasting, not just historical compliance.

They also expect digital basics: online portals, transparent pricing, mobile access. Firms still running on phone calls and email attachments lose clients to competitors who’ve figured this out.

Talent Shortage

75% of CPAs retiring within 15 years. Exam candidates down 37%. The traditional model of hiring staff accountants out of college and promoting through ranks doesn’t work at scale anymore.¹ Firms that adapt are going remote, using fractional professionals, tapping offshore resources, and using technology to reduce how much human labor routine tasks require.

Profitability Pressure

Compliance-only firms are getting squeezed. Technology reduces labor for basic returns, but prices can’t drop to match without killing margins. Advisory-focused firms see median profit margins of 34%, top performers hitting 47%.⁴ The gap keeps widening.

Tax Practice Business Models

Four models dominate. Most firms run some hybrid, but understanding the pure versions helps you see where you are and where you might go.

Compliance-Only Model

Description: Seasonal tax preparation focus with minimal year-round client interaction. Revenue concentrated in Q1 (January-April). Services limited to tax return preparation, possibly bookkeeping and payroll.

Pros:

• Simple operational model
• Predictable workflow (tax season vs. off-season)
• Lower technology requirements initially
• Can operate with minimal staff

Cons:

• Commoditized services with price pressure
• Seasonal cash flow volatility
• Difficult to retain quality staff (seasonal burnout)
• Limited growth ceiling
• Vulnerable to AI/automation disruption
• Low profit margins (15-25% typically)

Who It Works For: Solo practitioners in low-cost-of-living areas serving simple individual returns, or practitioners nearing retirement not seeking growth.

Warning Signs You’ve Outgrown This Model:

• Can’t increase prices without losing clients
• Staff turnover exceeds 30% annually
• Cash flow problems in summer/fall
• Declining client counts year-over-year
• Unable to attract quality staff at market rates

Learn more about the viability challenges in our analysis of orphan 1040 clients and why many firms are moving away from compliance-only models.

Advisory-First Model

Description: Position as strategic advisor first, tax preparer second. Year-round client engagement through proactive planning, business advisory, financial forecasting, wealth management, and strategic consulting. Tax compliance becomes a by-product of ongoing advisory relationship.

Pros:

• Premium pricing ($300-500/hour vs. $150-200 for compliance)
• Year-round revenue smooths cash flow
• Higher profit margins (35-50%)
• Attracts and retains top talent
• Differentiated positioning (not competing on price)
• Resistant to AI/automation (high-touch advisory difficult to automate)

Cons:

• Requires different skill sets (communication, consulting, business acumen)
• Longer sales cycles (advisory relationships vs. transactional compliance)
• Higher marketing investment to attract advisory clients
• May need to fire low-value compliance clients to create capacity

Who It Works For: Practitioners with business consulting skills serving business owners, executives, and high-net-worth individuals. Best for firms willing to invest in repositioning and client portfolio transformation.

Success Requirements:

• Strong communication and consulting skills
• Business acumen beyond tax technical knowledge
• Willingness to have uncomfortable pricing conversations
• Marketing that demonstrates expertise and builds trust
• Systems to deliver consistent advisory value year-round

Hybrid CAS Model

Description: Combine Client Accounting Services (bookkeeping, controller services, CFO advisory) with tax compliance. Provide year-round financial management that enables proactive tax planning. Compliance work flows naturally from ongoing accounting relationship.

Pros:

• Year-round engagement and revenue
• Natural upsell path (bookkeeping → tax → advisory)
• High visibility into client finances enables better tax planning
• Strong client retention (harder to switch accountants mid-year)
• Profit margins 25-40%

Cons:

• Requires additional staff skills (bookkeeping, accounting software expertise)
• More complex operations (monthly deliverables vs. annual)
• Technology requirements higher (QuickBooks, Xero, bill pay, payroll)
• Longer onboarding for new clients

Who It Works For: Firms serving small businesses that need accounting support, not just tax preparation. Especially effective for businesses with 1-50 employees that can’t justify full-time controller.

Typical Service Stack:

• Monthly bookkeeping and reconciliation
• Financial statement preparation
• Cash flow forecasting and management
• Quarterly tax planning and estimates
• Annual tax return preparation
• Strategic advisory and CFO services (top tier)

Firms successfully operating this model see 16% annual growth and are “the fastest growing service area in public accounting.”⁴

Niche Specialization Model

Description: Deep expertise in specific industry vertical (construction, healthcare, real estate) or service area (international tax, estate planning, cryptocurrency, R&D credits). Command premium pricing through specialized knowledge.

Pros:

• Premium pricing (30-50% above generalists)
• Streamlined operations (similar clients, repeatable processes)
• Strong referral networks within niche
• Easier marketing (clear target audience)
• Defensible competitive position

Cons:

• Risk concentration (economic downturn in your niche hurts)
• Requires significant expertise investment
• Smaller addressable market initially
• May turn away non-niche work, limiting growth temporarily

Who It Works For: Practitioners with existing expertise in an industry or tax specialty, or those willing to invest 2-3 years building niche authority.

Profitable Niche Examples:

• Medical practices (complex entity structures, buy-ins/buy-outs)
• Construction contractors (job costing, prevailing wage)
• Real estate investors (1031 exchanges, cost segregation)
• E-commerce sellers (sales tax nexus, inventory accounting)
• International businesses (transfer pricing, foreign reporting)
• High-net-worth individuals (estate planning, trust tax)

From Compliance to Advisory: The Strategic Shift

The most significant strategic decision facing tax practices is whether and how to transition from compliance to advisory services.

Why Compliance-Only Is Becoming Unsustainable

Compliance services are commoditized with little differentiation. A tax return looks the same regardless of who prepared it, and most firms include identical compliance descriptions on invoices.² As AI automates data extraction and return preparation, the value of manual compliance work declines. Clients increasingly view tax preparation as a commodity service they can get anywhere, including free government programs.

The Advisory Value Proposition

Advisory services are differentiated by unique expertise and experience. The advice, strategy, and planning that goes into tax and financial decisions varies dramatically by practitioner. Clients can’t get sophisticated tax planning from TurboTax or the IRS. This creates pricing power and competitive moats.

Advisory profitability far exceeds compliance: median profit margins of 34% vs. 15-25% for compliance-only firms, with top advisory performers reaching 47%.⁴

What “Advisory Services” Actually Means

Advisory encompasses a wide range beyond basic accounting:²

Tax Advisory:

• Proactive tax planning (not just historical compliance)
• Entity structure optimization
• Multi-year tax projections
• Strategy around major transactions (selling business, real estate)
• Tax credits and incentives identification

Business Advisory:

• Strategic planning and goal setting
• Profitability analysis and improvement
• Pricing strategy
• Key performance indicator (KPI) dashboard
• Business valuation

Financial Advisory:

• Cash flow forecasting and management
• Capital allocation decisions
• Debt vs. equity financing
• Financial statement analysis
• Budgeting and variance analysis

Wealth Management:

• Retirement planning
• Investment strategy
• Estate and succession planning
• Risk management and insurance review

The Transition Roadmap

Phase 1: Add Advisory to Existing Compliance (Hybrid)

• Continue serving compliance clients
• Identify 10-20 best clients for advisory pilot
• Offer proactive planning calls quarterly
• Charge separately for advisory time
• Test messaging and service delivery

Phase 2: Reposition Existing Clients

• Transition compliance clients to advisory agreements
• Implement year-round engagement model
• Shift from hourly to value/retainer pricing
• Fire bottom 20% of clients who won’t transition

Phase 3: Advisory-First Marketing

• Market advisory positioning to new prospects
• Stop accepting compliance-only clients
• Require advisory engagement for tax work
• Achieve 60%+ revenue from advisory vs. compliance

Timeline: Expect 2-3 years for full transition. Rushing creates cash flow problems; dragging it out creates margin pressure.

Common Transition Mistakes:

• Giving away advisory for free (“included with tax preparation”)
• Underpricing advisory services (charging compliance rates for advisory work)
• Lack of service productization (inconsistent advisory delivery)
• No client communication (clients don’t understand or value advisory)
• Accepting all clients instead of selecting advisory-ready ones

Pricing Strategies for Tax Practices

How you price directly impacts profitability, client quality, and practice growth.

Hourly Billing (Traditional)

Pros: Simple, tracks actual time, easy to explain Cons: Punishes efficiency, caps revenue, creates billing disputes, doesn’t capture value

Reality: Hourly billing is declining in modern practices. When you automate data entry and cut return prep time from 4 hours to 1 hour, hourly billing means you earn less for the same value delivered to clients. This creates perverse incentives against efficiency improvements.

Value-Based Pricing

Concept: Price based on value delivered to client, not hours spent

Example: Tax planning strategy that saves client $50,000 is worth $5,000-10,000 in fees, regardless of whether it took you 2 hours or 10 hours to develop.

Pros: Captures full value, rewards efficiency and expertise, higher profitability Cons: Requires confidence in value delivery, client education needed, can’t use for all services

Best Application: Advisory services, tax planning, strategic consulting, business transactions

Fixed-Fee Packages

Concept: Bundled services at fixed price, scope-defined upfront

Example Packages:

• Individual Tax Return: $500 (W-2 employee, standard deduction)
• Small Business Tax + Quarterly Planning: $3,500/year
• Full-Service CAS + Advisory: $1,500/month retainer

Pros: Predictable revenue, clients know cost upfront, incentivizes efficiency Cons: Scope creep risk, must define boundaries clearly, occasional money-losers

Best Application: Repeatable services with similar clients

Retainer/Subscription Model

Concept: Monthly recurring fee for year-round access and services

Example: $750/month retainer includes unlimited consultations, quarterly planning, tax return, financial reviews

Pros: Predictable monthly revenue, year-round engagement, smooths cash flow Cons: Must deliver ongoing value, client retention critical, not suited to all client types

Best Application: Advisory relationships, CAS clients, businesses needing regular support

Pricing Psychology

Price Anchoring: Lead with premium package, make mid-tier look reasonable by comparison

Good-Better-Best Tiers:

• Basic: Compliance only ($X)
• Plus: Compliance + quarterly planning ($X + 50%)
• Premium: Full advisory relationship ($X + 150%)

Most clients choose middle tier, but presenting top tier makes middle seem affordable.

Minimum Fees: Set minimum engagement fees ($1,500-3,000) to attract quality clients and cover operational costs. Low-fee clients often demand disproportionate time.

Client Selection and Portfolio Management

Strategic client selection improves profitability, reduces stress, and creates capacity for growth.

The 80/20 Reality

Typically 20% of clients generate 80% of revenue and 20% of headaches. The bottom 20% generate minimal revenue but consume disproportionate time through late documents, scope creep, payment issues, and high-maintenance behavior.

Client Segmentation Framework

Tier 1 (Top 20%):

• Advisory relationships, year-round engagement
• Professional, responsive, pay on time
• $5,000+ annual revenue
• Strategy: Protect and expand these relationships

Tier 2 (Middle 60%):

• Solid compliance clients, occasional advisory
• Generally professional, manageable issues
• $1,000-5,000 annual revenue
• Strategy: Upsell to Tier 1 advisory model or maintain efficiently

Tier 3 (Bottom 20%):

• Compliance-only, often problematic
• Late documents, payment issues, price-sensitive
• Under $1,000 annual revenue
• Strategy: Raise prices 30-50% or transition out

When to Fire Clients

Fire clients who:

• Consistently submit documents after your deadline (3+ years running)
• Dispute or delay payment regularly
• Demand excessive time for fee paid (profitability analysis shows losses)
• Exhibit abusive or disrespectful behavior toward staff
• Ignore your advice repeatedly then blame you for consequences

Firing bottom 20% of clients typically improves profitability 15-25% even with no revenue replacement, due to eliminated operational drag.

Read our detailed analysis of orphan 1040 client management for strategies on client portfolio decisions.

Ideal Client Profile

Develop clear criteria:

• Business type/industry (if specializing)
• Annual revenue or complexity level
• Geographic location (if meeting in person matters)
• Technology comfort (will they use portal, video calls?)
• Budget range (can they afford your pricing?)
• Growth trajectory (advisory potential?)

Use this profile to qualify prospects before engagement. “No” to poor-fit prospects creates capacity for ideal clients.

Specialization vs. Generalist Approach

Should you specialize or remain a generalist? Both can work, with different trade-offs.

Generalist Benefits:

• Larger addressable market
• Diversified risk (not dependent on single industry)
• Can accept any client who walks in door
• Easier to build initially (no niche expertise required)

Generalist Challenges:

• Difficult to differentiate from competitors
• Price pressure (clients see you as interchangeable)
• Inefficient operations (every client different)
• Marketing is expensive and generic
• Expertise spread thin across many areas

Specialist Benefits:

• Premium pricing (30-50% above generalists for niche expertise)
• Streamlined operations (similar clients, repeatable processes)
• Strong referral networks (niche communities share recommendations)
• Easier marketing (clear target, demonstrable expertise)
• Defensible competitive position

Specialist Challenges:

• Risk concentration if niche declines
• Requires 2-3 years of expertise investment
• Must turn away non-niche work initially
• Smaller immediate addressable market

Choosing a Niche

Good niches meet three criteria:

1. Sufficient Market Size: Enough prospects in your geography to support practice
2. Underserved: Lack of specialized practitioners creates opportunity
3. Your Advantage: Existing expertise, connections, or genuine interest

Examples of profitable niches:

• Industry verticals: Medical practices, construction, real estate, e-commerce
• Tax specialties: International tax, estate planning, R&D credits, cost segregation
• Business life stages: Startups, acquisitions/sales, succession planning
• Demographic: Physicians, dentists, attorneys, executives

Technology as Competitive Advantage

Technology is no longer optional. It’s the foundation of modern practice efficiency and competitive differentiation.

Core Technology Stack

Tax Software: UltraTax, Lacerte, ProSeries, Drake (commodity, all work)

Practice Management: TaxDome, Karbon, Canopy, Financial Cents (workflow, deadlines, client tracking). See our practice management software comparison to choose the right platform for your firm, or our TaxDome vs Canopy vs Financial Cents head-to-head for a detailed comparison of those three options.

Client Portal: Secure document exchange, e-signatures, communication (often integrated with practice management)

Document Management: Cloud storage, automated organization, OCR data extraction

Accounting Software: QuickBooks Online, Xero (for CAS clients)

Communication: Video conferencing (Zoom), secure messaging, team collaboration

Technology That Creates Advantage

Data Extraction Automation: AI-powered OCR that eliminates manual data entry from tax forms, receipts, bank statements. Saves 10-15 hours weekly during tax season. See our comprehensive data extraction guide for implementation strategies.

Client Portal: Branded portal where clients upload documents, sign forms, view status, pay invoices. Reduces email chaos, improves security, enhances client experience.

Workflow Automation: Automated reminder sequences, status update triggers, deadline tracking. Eliminates manual follow-up overhead.

Advisory Dashboards: Real-time financial KPI visibility for clients. Demonstrates value, enables proactive conversations.

Technology ROI

Typical investments: $300-800/month for full stack Time savings: 10-20 hours weekly during peak, 5-10 hours off-season Value creation:

• 15+ hours weekly @ $250/hour = $3,750/week in billable capacity
• Over 13-week tax season = $48,750 value from $2,600 investment
• ROI: 1,775%

Technology doesn’t cost, it pays. The real cost is operating without it and losing competitive ground to technology-enabled competitors.

Staffing Models for Modern Practices

Traditional staffing (full-time employees progressing through ranks) is giving way to more flexible models.

Hybrid Staffing

Combination of:

• Core full-time team (partners, senior managers)
• Fractional specialists (brought in for specific expertise)
• Contract seasonal staff (tax season support)
• Offshore resources (data entry, bookkeeping, research)

Benefits: Flexibility, cost efficiency, access to specialized talent without full-time commitment

Remote/Distributed Teams

Eliminate geographic hiring constraints. Tap national talent pools. Offer flexibility that attracts quality staff in tight labor market.

Technology requirements: Cloud-based systems, video conferencing, project management tools, security protocols

Leveraged Model Alternatives

Instead of traditional pyramid (1 partner: 3 managers: 10 staff):

Technology-Leveraged: 1 partner: 1 manager: automation/AI handles routine work of 5-7 staff

Specialist Leveraged: 1 partner: 2-3 specialists (tax, advisory, CAS) each operating semi-autonomously

Service-Provider Leveraged: 1 partner outsources compliance entirely to offshore firm, focuses 100% on client relationships and advisory

No single right answer. Match staffing model to your service offerings, growth goals, and management preferences.

Practice Profitability Metrics

Track these metrics to understand practice health and make strategic decisions.

Revenue Per Client: Total revenue ÷ number of clients

• Target: $2,000-5,000 for compliance, $5,000-15,000 for advisory
• Trend: Should increase annually (price increases, service expansion)

Effective Hourly Rate: Total revenue ÷ total hours worked

• Target: $200-300/hour for partners, $100-150 for staff
• Trend: Should increase as you use technology and eliminate low-value work

Profit Margin: (Revenue - Expenses) ÷ Revenue

• Target: 25-35% compliance firms, 35-50% advisory firms
• Compare: Top advisory performers hit 47%⁴

Revenue Per Full-Time Equivalent (FTE): Total revenue ÷ number of FTE staff

• Target: $150,000-250,000 per FTE
• Higher is better (more efficiency, better technology)

Realization Rate: Actual fees collected ÷ standard fees charged

• Target: 95%+ (anything below 90% indicates write-offs or collection issues)

Client Retention: % of clients who return year-over-year

• Target: 90%+ for individual clients, 95%+ for business clients
• Below 85% indicates pricing, service, or communication problems

Common Strategic Mistakes

Learning from others’ errors saves years and thousands in lost opportunity.

Mistake 1: Competing on Price

Racing to the bottom by undercutting competitors leads to unprofitable client portfolios, inability to invest in technology/staff, and burnout. Price reflects value positioning. Low prices attract price-sensitive clients who leave for anyone $50 cheaper.

Solution: Compete on value, expertise, and service quality. Raise prices 10-15% annually. Fire bottom 20% of clients and replace with better-fit prospects.

Mistake 2: Accepting All Clients

Saying yes to everyone creates unfocused practices serving incompatible client types, makes marketing generic and expensive, and spreads expertise too thin.

Solution: Define ideal client profile. Politely decline poor-fit prospects. Build reputation in specific niche.

Mistake 3: Underpricing Advisory Services

Charging compliance rates for advisory work undervalues expertise, trains clients to expect free advice, and makes advisory unprofitable.

Solution: Separate pricing for compliance vs. advisory. Charge premium rates ($250-400/hour or value-based) for strategic consulting.

Mistake 4: Neglecting Technology Investment

Operating with outdated systems wastes staff time on manual work, creates poor client experience, and limits capacity growth.

Solution: Invest 5-10% of revenue in technology. Prioritize automation that eliminates non-billable time.

Mistake 5: No Client Portfolio Management

Treating all clients equally regardless of profitability or fit leads to bottom 20% consuming disproportionate resources and top 20% feeling neglected.

Solution: Segment clients into tiers. Deliver premium service to top tier. Transition or fire bottom tier.

Mistake 6: Seasonal Mindset

Operating 4 months on, 8 months off creates cash flow volatility, staff retention problems, and inefficient resource utilization.

Solution: Transition to year-round engagement model through advisory, CAS, or retainers. Smooth revenue across 12 months.

FAQs: Tax Practice Strategy

Q: Should I transition from compliance to advisory services?

A: For most practices, yes, but gradually. Advisory services are more profitable (34-47% margins vs. 15-25%), command premium pricing, create year-round engagement, and are resistant to AI automation. Transition over 2-3 years by adding advisory to best existing clients first, then repositioning marketing for new advisory clients.

Q: How do I price advisory services?

A: Move away from hourly billing toward value-based or retainer pricing. Typical advisory rates: $250-400/hour for consulting, or monthly retainers of $500-2,000 depending on scope. Price should reflect value delivered (tax savings, strategic guidance, business growth) not just hours spent.

Q: What’s the most profitable tax practice business model?

A: Advisory-first practices achieve highest profit margins (35-50% vs. 15-25% for compliance-only). Firms combining Client Accounting Services (CAS) with tax advisory show 16% annual growth and are the fastest-growing segment. Niche specialization enables 30-50% price premiums.

Q: Should I specialize in a niche or remain a generalist?

A: Specialization offers premium pricing, efficient operations, and defensible competitive positioning, but requires 2-3 years of expertise investment. Generalists have larger addressable markets but face price pressure and differentiation challenges. Many successful firms start generalist, then specialize as they identify profitable client concentrations.

Q: How do I transition away from low-value compliance clients?

A: Raise prices 30-50% for bottom-tier clients. Many will leave, freeing capacity for better clients. For those who stay at higher prices, they’re now profitable. Communicate changes professionally: “We’re focusing on advisory services for business clients. For compliance-only, our new rate is $X. Happy to refer you elsewhere if that doesn’t fit your budget.”

Q: What technology investments should I prioritize?

A: Start with client portal and data extraction automation. These deliver immediate ROI through time savings and improved client experience. Then add practice management for workflow automation. Total investment: $300-800/month typically saves 15-20 hours weekly, worth $50,000+ annually at billable rates.

Q: How do I handle the IRS Direct File program and free tax competition?

A: Free programs target simple returns (W-2 only, standard deduction). These were never profitable clients. Focus your practice on complex returns, business clients, and advisory services that free programs can’t provide. Technology competition validates moving upmarket. Read our analysis of IRS Direct File client opportunities for positioning strategies.

Q: What profit margins should I target?

A: Compliance-only practices: 25-35%. Advisory-focused practices: 35-50%. Top performers reach 47%. If your margins are below 20%, you have pricing problems, operational inefficiencies, or unprofitable client mix. Audit your client portfolio and operations to identify issues.

Q: How do I attract advisory clients vs. compliance clients?

A: Position marketing around business problems (cash flow management, tax planning, growth strategy) not services (tax returns, bookkeeping). Demonstrate expertise through content (blog posts, videos, presentations). Network in business communities (chambers, industry associations) not just tax circles. Charge premium prices that filter out price-sensitive compliance seekers.

Q: Should I offer both individual and business tax services?

A: Business clients are typically more profitable (higher fees, advisory opportunities, year-round engagement) than individual 1040s. Many firms focus exclusively on businesses or phase out individual clients over time. If you do both, segment clearly and ensure individual clients are priced profitably. Avoid the “orphan 1040” trap of underpriced, time-consuming individual returns.

What Actually Changes a Practice

None of this is about working harder. It’s about deciding what kind of firm you want to run.

Some practitioners love the 1040 grind: intense tax season, quiet summers, clients they’ve known for decades. That works if the economics work. Others want year-round advisory relationships, premium pricing, and clients who see them as strategic partners. That works too, if you’re willing to fire the clients who don’t fit.

The mistake is trying to do both without the systems to support either. Running a high-volume compliance practice with manual processes burns people out. Running an advisory practice while accepting any client who walks in the door kills your margins.

Pick a model. Build systems for that model. Fire the clients who don’t fit. The firms that grow are the ones that make deliberate choices instead of accepting whatever comes through the door.

Conto automates the document processing that eats your capacity. See how it works with your messiest client files.